From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olivarez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 9, 2022
No. 05-21-00630-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2022)

Opinion

05-21-00621-CR 05-21-00622-CR05-21-00623-CR 05-21-00624-CR 05-21-00627-CR05-21-00628-CR 05-21-00629-CR 05-21-00630-CR05-21-00634-CR 05-21-00635-CR 05-21-00636-CR05-21-00637-CR

09-09-2022

BRANDIE OLIVAREZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F18-22537-K, F18-41244-K, F18-45948-K, F19-14122-K, F19-14136-K, F20-22413-K, F20-22447-K, F20-41532-K, F19-40342-K, F20-22421-K, F20-45665-K & F20-45679-K

ORDER

BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

On July 25, 2022, counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a supporting Anders brief in these appeals. We issue this order to address deficiencies in counsel's motion, to order that appellant be provided with a copy of the brief and the record, and to order that a supplemental clerk's record be filed in one appeal.

The motion to withdraw states that a copy of the brief, motion to withdraw, notice of filing, and a complete copy of the record was delivered to "Mr. Celaya." The motion further states that "Mr. Celaya" had been "notified in writing of his right to object to this motion and the applicable deadlines for filing a response." The certificate of service indicates that counsel mailed to appellant a copy of the motion to withdraw and a letter notifying her that she had a right to file her own response, but it does not indicate counsel transmitted to appellant a copy of the brief or a copy of the record. The Court's own letter enclosing a copy of counsel's motion and the brief was returned to sender for inadequate postage. Thus, it appears from the record appellant has not received a copy of counsel's Anders brief. Appellant has filed a pro se letter with the Court seeking permission to review the record and file her own response.

The State has filed a response agreeing with counsel that the appeals are frivolous, but noting that the clerk's record in cause no. 05-21-00637-CR does not include a copy of the trial court's judgment. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk's record containing the judgment in cause no. 05-22-00637-CR (trial court cause no. F20-45679-K).

We ORDER counsel to file an amended motion to withdraw within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. We ORDER counsel to serve a copy of the amended motion to withdraw and the Anders brief on appellant.

Because appellant has requested permission to review the record and file a pro se brief, we ORDER counsel to send appellant paper copies of the clerk's and reporter's records (with the exception of any CDs or DVDs which are not allowed by regulations of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice).

We ORDER counsel to provide this Court, within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the amended motion to withdraw, Anders brief, and record have been sent to appellant.

Appellant's pro se response is due by November 30, 2022.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Dominique Collins, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 4; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; Valencia Bush; and Marcella Paige Williams, assistant district attorney.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Brandie Olivarez, BIN #21001873, Kays Tower, KT 04-C, P.O. Box 660334, Dallas, Texas 75266.


Summaries of

Olivarez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 9, 2022
No. 05-21-00630-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Olivarez v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRANDIE OLIVAREZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 9, 2022

Citations

No. 05-21-00630-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2022)