From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olivarez v. Davis

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 7, 2021
Civil Action 2:19-CV-396 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:19-CV-396

09-07-2021

GEORGE OLIVAREZ, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, et al., . Respondents.


ORDER

DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton's Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), entered on August 17, 2021. (D.E. 41). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiffs construed motion for relief from judgment (D.E. 39) under Rule 60(b) for failure to present extraordinary circumstances warranting relief.

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FEDR. CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the M&R. (D.E. 42). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, the applicable law, and having made a de novo review of the portions of the M&R to which Plaintiffs objections were directed, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections. (D.E. 42). Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 41). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. (D.E. 39).


Summaries of

Olivarez v. Davis

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 7, 2021
Civil Action 2:19-CV-396 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Olivarez v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE OLIVAREZ, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, et al., . Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 2:19-CV-396 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2021)