From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olic v. Lizarraga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2022
2:17-cv-0156 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-0156 KJM AC P

10-10-2022

MILORAD OLIC, Petitioner, v. JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 19, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 29. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, ECF No. 30, and respondent has replied to the objections, ECF No. 31.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued April 19, 2022 (ECF No. 29), are ADOPTED in full;

2. The petition is DENIED and this case is closed; and

3. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Olic v. Lizarraga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2022
2:17-cv-0156 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Olic v. Lizarraga

Case Details

Full title:MILORAD OLIC, Petitioner, v. JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 10, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-0156 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2022)