From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olic v. Lizarraga

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
2:14-cv-2120 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion


MILORAD OLIC, Petitioner, v. WARDEN JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Respondent. No. 2:14-cv-2120 KJM GGH P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 31, 2015

          ORDER

          GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner has now filed his amended petition; however, he has filed a statement indicating that nine pages of an exhibit to the amended petition are missing due to a copying error. (ECF No. 19) The court construes petitioner's statement as a request for an extension of time to file his missing exhibits. Good cause appearing, the request will be granted.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Petitioner's March 26, 2015 statement, construed as a request for an extension of time (ECF No. 19) is granted; and

         2. Petitioner is granted until April 9, 2015 to file exhibits to his amended petition.


Summaries of

Olic v. Lizarraga

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
2:14-cv-2120 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Olic v. Lizarraga

Case Details

Full title:MILORAD OLIC, Petitioner, v. WARDEN JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-2120 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)