From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olguin v. Kibler

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2021
2:21-cv-0368-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0368-JAM-EFB P

11-15-2021

EDWARDO VINCENT OLGUIN, Petitioner, v. BRIAN KIBLER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 24, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 24, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied;

3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and

4. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Olguin v. Kibler

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2021
2:21-cv-0368-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Olguin v. Kibler

Case Details

Full title:EDWARDO VINCENT OLGUIN, Petitioner, v. BRIAN KIBLER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0368-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2021)