From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oler v. Hartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Dec 29, 2005
Case No. C 03 3701 VRW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C 03 3701 VRW.

December 29, 2005

CURTIS G. OLER, ESQ., CREIGHTON G. OLER, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS G. OLER, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff Charlene M. Oler.

GALTON HELM LLP, DANIEL W. MAGUIRE, State Bar No. 120002, EDITH S. SHEA, State Bar No. 177578, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (erroneously named Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company).


STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER


Plaintiff Charlene M. Oler and Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (erroneously named Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company) hereby stipulate, by and through their counsel of record, that the above-referenced case shall be dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own separate expenses, costs, and attorneys' fees.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oler v. Hartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Dec 29, 2005
Case No. C 03 3701 VRW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Oler v. Hartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLENE M. OLER, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Dec 29, 2005

Citations

Case No. C 03 3701 VRW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2005)