From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Leary v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 13, 2012
No. CIV S-09-2601 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2601 GEB CKD P

04-13-2012

GARY FRANCIS O'LEARY, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN CLARK, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 51) is denied.

___________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

O'Leary v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 13, 2012
No. CIV S-09-2601 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2012)
Case details for

O'Leary v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:GARY FRANCIS O'LEARY, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN CLARK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 13, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2601 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2012)