From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ole Smoky Distillery, Inc. v. King Distilling, Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 10, 2021
3:19-CV-178-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 10, 2021)

Opinion

3:19-CV-178-TAV-DCP

11-10-2021

OLE SMOKY DISTILLERY, INC., Plaintiff, v. KING DISTILLING, CO. LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

DEBRA C. POPLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court, and Standing Order 13-02.

Now before the Court is a Stipulation to Amend the Complaint (“Stipulation”) [Doc. 71]. The Stipulation states that Plaintiff intends to file an Amended Complaint to include allegations regarding Defendant's intended use of SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE and/or GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS MOONSHINE. The Court observes that Plaintiff has filed the proposed Amended Complaint [Doc. 71-1] as an exhibit to the Stipulation.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), a party may amend its pleading with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave. Here, the parties have agreed to the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff SHALL file its proposed Amended Complaint [Doc. 71-1] as its operative pleading in CM/ECF on or before November 17, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Ole Smoky Distillery, Inc. v. King Distilling, Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 10, 2021
3:19-CV-178-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Ole Smoky Distillery, Inc. v. King Distilling, Co.

Case Details

Full title:OLE SMOKY DISTILLERY, INC., Plaintiff, v. KING DISTILLING, CO. LLC…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

3:19-CV-178-TAV-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 10, 2021)