Summary
differentiating from Bukowski v. Commissioner, No. 13-cv-12040, 2014 WL 4823861 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 26, 2014), as "[i]n sum, the ALJ's decision in Bukowski was affirmed because the court found sufficient Step Three analysis elsewhere in the ALJ's opinion which permitted meaningful judicial review. In the instant case, however, I find no analysis of Listings 1.04 or 11.03 anywhere in the ALJ's opinion, requiring instead, a de novo analysis of the record evidence"
Summary of this case from Jenkins v. BerryhillOpinion
Case No. 1:13-CV-1303
02-06-2015
MARY OLDENKAMP, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green's January 12, 2015 Report and Recommendation recommending that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties on January 12, 2015. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Therefore the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation issued January 12, 2015 (dkt. #21), is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with that Opinion. Dated: February 6, 2015
/s/ Gordon J. Quist
GORDON J. QUIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE