Opinion
No. 07-15202.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed July 27, 2007.
John Olagues, River Ridge, LA, pro se.
Anna Erickson White, Morrison Foerster, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Jordon Eth, Esq., Mark D. Gursky, Esq., Morrison Foerster, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-06-04286-MJJ.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judges, HAWKINS and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
A review of the record and the responses to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.