From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olague v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 5, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0331 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0331 LKK EFB PS.

May 5, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding in pro se, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This matter was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Pursuant to federal statute, a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action in federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit showing that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). An in forma pauperis applicant must demonstrate that because of her poverty, she cannot meet court costs and still provide himself and his dependents with the necessities of life. Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc., 364 F.3d 1305, 1307 (11th Cir. 2004) (affidavit is sufficient if it represents that the litigant is "unable to pay for the court fees and costs, and to provide necessities for himself and his dependents") (citing Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948)); see also Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., 865 F.2d 22, 23 (2d Cir. 1988) (denying in forma pauper is status where applicant had a net income of approximately $20,000).

Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit in support of the application to proceed in forma pauperis, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Dckt. No. 2. However, the first page of the affidavit is blank. Because plaintiff has not provided any information to this court regarding her employment or other income, this court cannot determine whether plaintiff is unable to pay the costs of suit or give security therefor.

Accordingly, plaintiff is directed to file, within fourteen days of this order, a further affidavit containing the required information regarding plaintiff's employment income and any other income she has received within the past twelve months. The court will then resume consideration of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. A failure to file a further affidavit as ordered will result in a recommendation that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Olague v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 5, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0331 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Olague v. County of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:CASSANDRA C. OLAGUE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 5, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0331 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. May. 5, 2011)