From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

OKOH v. OKOH

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 25, 2006
918 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2D04-5295.

October 12, 2005. Rehearing Denied January 25, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Charles Ed Bergmann, Judge.

Lisa M. Okoh, pro se.

Lorena L. Kiely of Law Office of Lorena L. Kiely, Tampa (withdrew after initial briefing), for Appellant.

Caroline K. Black, Tampa, and Ingrid Anderson, Clearwater, for Appellee.


In this difficult case, we are bound by the standard of review, which is whether the trial court's decision to set aside or uphold a marital settlement agreement was supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Hjortaas v. McCabe, 656 So.2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Maas v. Maas, 440 So.2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We cannot reweigh the evidence, and the record does not reflect that the trial court committed reversible error. Accordingly, the trial court's order on the enforceability of the written marital settlement agreement is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

OKOH v. OKOH

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 25, 2006
918 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

OKOH v. OKOH

Case Details

Full title:Lisa M. OKOH, Appellant, v. James I. OKOH, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 25, 2006

Citations

918 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)