From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Okland Constr. Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Jun. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB

06-12-2012

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff, v. THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance company, ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company, ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance company, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland


ORDER

This matter arises on the following:

(1) Defendant and Cross-Claim Defendant Everest National Insurance Company's Motion for Leave to Amend Its Pleading to Assert Counterclaims Against Plaintiff Okland Construction Company and Cross-Claims Against Defendants The Travelers Indemnity Company of America, The Phoenix Insurance Company, and St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company [Doc. # 51, filed 5/25/2012] ("Everest's Motion to Amend"); and

(2) The Phoenix Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company of America, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America's Motion for Leave to Amend Its Pleadings to Add Counterclaims Against Okland Construction Company, Inc and Amended Cross Claims Against Everest National Insurance Company [Doc. # 52, filed 5/25/2012] ("Phoenix' Motion to Amend").

The motions were set to be heard on June 12, 2012. Prior to the hearing, my chambers was contacted and informed that neither motion is opposed.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Everest's Motion to Amend [Doc. # 51] is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing Doc. # 51-1; and

(2) Phoenix' Motion to Amend [Doc. # 52] is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing Doc. # 52-1.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Okland Constr. Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 12, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Jun. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Okland Constr. Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff, v. THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 12, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Jun. 12, 2012)