From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Okeke v. Momah

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 7, 2015
132 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

10-07-2015

Ositadinma OKEKE, etc., appellant, et al., plaintiffs, v. Nathan MOMAH, etc., et al., respondents, et al., defendant.

O. Benjamin Okeke, suing herein as Ositadinma Okeke, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se. Yoram Nachimovsky, PPLC, New York, N.Y. (Nicholas S. Ratush of counsel), for respondents.


O. Benjamin Okeke, suing herein as Ositadinma Okeke, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Yoram Nachimovsky, PPLC, New York, N.Y. (Nicholas S. Ratush of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, the plaintiff Ositadinma Okeke appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), dated August 14, 2013, which denied his motion to disqualify the defendants' attorney from representing the defendants in this action and denied his separate motion for a preliminary injunction.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.In light of our determination that the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction was properly granted (see Okeke v. Momah, 132 A.D.3d 648, 17 N.Y.S.3d 746, 2015 WL 5827144 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2014–02337; decided herewith] ), we dismiss the instant appeal as academic (see Goldbourne v. Williams, 175 A.D.2d 860, 573 N.Y.S.2d 706 ).

RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, LaSALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Okeke v. Momah

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 7, 2015
132 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Okeke v. Momah

Case Details

Full title:Ositadinma OKEKE, etc., appellant, et al., plaintiffs, v. Nathan MOMAH…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

Citations

132 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
132 A.D.3d 648
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 7251