From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Keefe's, Inc. v. Technical Glass Prods. Anemostat & Pilkington PLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
CASE NO.: 07-3535 LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 07-3535 LHK

11-22-2011

O'KEEFE'S, INC. a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICAL GLASS PRODUCTS, ANEMOSTAT AND PILKINGTON PLC, Defendants.

Jeffrey S. Love (State Bar No. 195068) Todd M. Siegel ( Pro Hac Vice ) Klarquist Sparkman, LLP Kevin H. Vanderleeden MCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP John B. Scherling (State Bar No. 122234) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC Mark I. Schickman (State Bar No. 62653) FREELAND COOPER & FOREMAN LLP John T. Callahan ( pro hac vice ) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC


Jeffrey S. Love (State Bar No. 195068)

Todd M. Siegel (Pro Hac Vice)

Klarquist Sparkman, LLP

Kevin H. Vanderleeden

MCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP

John B. Scherling (State Bar No. 122234)

SUGHRUE MION, PLLC

Mark I. Schickman (State Bar No. 62653)

FREELAND COOPER & FOREMAN LLP

John T. Callahan (pro hac vice)

SUGHRUE MION, PLLC

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND TOLLING AGREEMENT

AND ORDER

Pursuant to the October 28, 2011 Order of the Court, the parties to the above captioned action ("the parties") hereby stipulate to dismiss the above action without prejudice. All statutes of limitations and other time limitations, whether by court rule or otherwise, on all claims and counterclaims and prayers for costs and attorney fees, are hereby tolled until thirty days after a full and final determination of all reexamination proceedings of the patent asserted in this lawsuit currently pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including the exhaustion of all appeals and the time deadline for filing appeals therefrom. As the intent of this agreement is to preserve and reserve all rights of each party as those rights exist as of the date of entry of the Order on this Stipulation through the foregoing thirty-day period, the passage of time during that period shall not be raised as the basis of a claim or defense by any party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

FREELAND COOPER & FOREMAN LLP

MARK I. SCHICKMAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Counterdefendant and

Counterclaimant O'KEEFFE'S, INC.

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP

JEFFREY S. LOVE

TODD M. SIEGEL

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

TECHNICAL GLASS PRODUCTS

MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER, LLP

KEVIN H. VANDERLEEDEN

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

ANEMOSTAT

SUGHRUE MION, PLLP

JOHN T. CALLAHAN

JOHN B. SCHERLING

Attorneys for Defendant PILKINGTON PLC

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties set forth above, the above captioned action is dismissed without prejudice.

Honorable Lucy H. Koh

United States District Judge


Summaries of

O'Keefe's, Inc. v. Technical Glass Prods. Anemostat & Pilkington PLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
CASE NO.: 07-3535 LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

O'Keefe's, Inc. v. Technical Glass Prods. Anemostat & Pilkington PLC

Case Details

Full title:O'KEEFE'S, INC. a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICAL GLASS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 07-3535 LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)