From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Keefe v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P

07-17-2012

TIMOTHY O'KEEFE, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 19, 2011, plaintiff filed a letter with the court requesting injunctive relief. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b)(1) provides that requests for court orders must be made by motion. In other words, plaintiff may not seek injunctive relief by way of a letter addressed to the court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's letter requesting injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 13) is disregarded.

______________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ok2659.dis


Summaries of

O'Keefe v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)
Case details for

O'Keefe v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY O'KEEFE, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

Citations

No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)