From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oiyemhonlan v. JP Morgan Mortg. Acquisition Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. 3-11-CV-06622 EDL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3-11-CV-06622 EDL

11-18-2011

JOSEPH O. OIYEMHONLAN, an individual and MARTHA OIYEMHONLAN, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP., business entity unknown; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP., business entity unknown; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.

BRYAN CAVE LLP C. Scott Greene, California Bar No. 277445 Sean D. Muntz, California Bar No. 223549 John C. Hedger, California Bar No. 230814 Attorneys for Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (erroneously named as Chase Bank); and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP., INC.


BRYAN CAVE LLP

C. Scott Greene, California Bar No. 277445

Sean D. Muntz, California Bar No. 223549

John C. Hedger, California Bar No. 230814

Attorneys for Defendants

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (erroneously named as Chase Bank); and QUALITY LOAN

SERVICE CORP., INC.

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRIOR ORDER ON STAY OF

PROCEEDINGS FOR SIXTY DAYS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER


Judge: Magistrate Elizabeth D. LaPorte

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Joseph and Martha Oiyemhonlan ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, ("Chase") and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP., INC. (collectively "Defendants") by and through their respective counsel, STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the County of Alameda on November 18, 2011;

WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011 in the Superior Court of the County of Alameda, Plaintiffs obtained an ex parte temporary restraining order ("TRO") enjoining the Trustee's sale of the real property at 27535 Orlando Avenue in Hayward, California (the "Property");

WHEREAS Defendants removed the action to this Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.section 1441(b) on December 22, 2011;

WHEREAS Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint on December 29, 2011;

WHEREAS the parties previously stipulated to stay all proceedings in this matter until March 19, 2012, including hearings, briefings, appearances and any other deadlines imposed by law or the Court, pending a determination by Defendant Chase of Plaintiffs' suitability for loan modification, which is economically and judicially efficient;

WHEREAS Chase has evaluated Plaintiffs for a loan modification and offered a loan modification to Plaintiffs that has yet to be accepted;

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is set for April 24, 2012;

WHEREAS the Case Management Conference is presently scheduled for April 24, 2012.

WHEREAS the parties stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs' time to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended to April 2, 2012;

WHEREAS the parties further stipulate and agree that Defendants' time to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss will be extended to April 9, 2012;

WHEREAS the parties further stipulate and agree that the extensions of time related to filings requested herein are not requested for purposes of delay and will not result in any prejudice to the parties or to the Court;

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, and the Court is respectfully requested to amend its prior order so that:

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to April 2, 2012;
2. The deadline for Defendants to file their reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to April 9, 2012;
3. The hearing on the motion to dismiss shall remain as set for April 24, 2012;
4. The case management conference shall remain as set for April 24, 2012;
5. The TRO obtained by Plaintiffs in the Superior Court in the County of Alameda shall remain in effect until this Court makes a determination on the TRO, or by further agreement by the parties.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BEDI & JOHNSON

By: __________

Ginny Bedi

BEDI & JOHNSON LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JOSEPH and MARTHA OIYEMHONLAN

BRYAN CAVE LLP

By: __________

John C. Hedger

Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A and QUALITY

LOAN SERVICE CORP., INC.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, John C. Hedger, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 26, 2012, at San Francisco, California.

______________

John C. Hedger

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the parties' Stipulation, hereby orders as follows:

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended to April 2, 2012
2. The deadline for Defendants to file their Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to April 9, 2012;
3. The hearing on the motion to dismiss shall remain set for April 24, 2012;
4. The case management conference shall remain set for April 24, 2012.
5. The TRO shall remain in effect until further determination by this Court on the TRO if the hearing date is re-noticed by Plaintiffs or by further agreement of the parties;

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By:__________

MAGISTRATE

JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT,

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


Summaries of

Oiyemhonlan v. JP Morgan Mortg. Acquisition Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. 3-11-CV-06622 EDL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Oiyemhonlan v. JP Morgan Mortg. Acquisition Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH O. OIYEMHONLAN, an individual and MARTHA OIYEMHONLAN, an…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3-11-CV-06622 EDL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)