From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Hern v. Ludowici-Celadon Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1911
146 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

October, 1911.


Plaintiff's exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant upon the nonsuit, with costs. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact for the jury.


Summaries of

O'Hern v. Ludowici-Celadon Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1911
146 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

O'Hern v. Ludowici-Celadon Company

Case Details

Full title:Harold A. O'Hern, by Mary E. McGee, His Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiff, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1911

Citations

146 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)