From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Hare v. Moniak

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. First Division
May 19, 1969
249 N.E.2d 178 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)

Opinion

Gen. No. 53,594.

May 19, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. THOMAS R. DORAN, Judge, presiding. Judgment reversed.

Baker McKenzie, of Chicago (Francis D. Morrissey and John T. Coleman, of counsel), for appellant.

No brief for appellee.


This is an appeal by the defendant, Charles Moniak, from an order of the trial court which imposed upon the defendant the obligation of paying to the plaintiff, Edward O'Hare, attorney's fees incurred in the unsuccessful prosecution of the plaintiff's lawsuit. The plaintiff had sought recovery from the defendant for property damage purportedly caused by the penetration of tree roots from defendant's tree into the adjacent land of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's action was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action, but the court, on its own motion, entered an order taxing attorney's fees against the defendant. The plaintiff-appellee has not filed a brief nor has he appeared in these proceedings in the Appellate Court.

[1, 2] Although the record reveals that the defendant did not expeditiously pursue its Motion to Dismiss, there is no indication of bad faith or vexatious tactics on the defendant's behalf. The defendant contends that attorney's fees are not allowable to the successful party in the absence of a statute or in the absence of some agreement or stipulation specifically authorizing the allowance thereof, and are never allowed to unsuccessful litigants. We agree. Such contention is well established in this State. Ritter v. Ritter, 381 Ill. 549, 46 N.E.2d 41 (1943); McGookey v. Winter, 334 Ill. App. 307, 79 N.E.2d 306 (1948). It should be noted also that section 10 of the Costs Act, Ill Rev Stats 1967, c 33, § 10, does not authorize the assessment of attorney's fees to either the successful or unsuccessful litigant. Bortree v. Macon, 121 Ill. App. 111 (1906).

The order entered against the defendant assessing attorney's fees as costs was error, and is therefore reversed.

Judgment reversed.

MURPHY and BURMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Hare v. Moniak

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. First Division
May 19, 1969
249 N.E.2d 178 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
Case details for

O'Hare v. Moniak

Case Details

Full title:Edward O'Hare, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Moniak, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. First Division

Date published: May 19, 1969

Citations

249 N.E.2d 178 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
249 N.E.2d 178

Citing Cases

State Farm Fire Cas. v. Miller Elec. Co.

• 4 Only those items of costs designated by statute may be allowed as costs, and attorney fees are "not of…

Messina v. City of Chicago

( Kerns v. Engelke (1979), 76 Ill.2d 154, 166, 390 N.E.2d 859, 865; Gonzales-Blanco v. Clayton (1983), 120…