From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Hara v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1901
167 N.Y. 567 (N.Y. 1901)

Opinion

Argued April 3, 1901

Decided May 14, 1901

John Whalen, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant.

George F. Langbein for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the prevailing opinion below.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, LANDON, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Dissenting: GRAY, J.


Summaries of

O'Hara v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1901
167 N.Y. 567 (N.Y. 1901)
Case details for

O'Hara v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LAWRENCE O'HARA, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 14, 1901

Citations

167 N.Y. 567 (N.Y. 1901)
60 N.E. 1117

Citing Cases

Cantwell v. City of New York

The difficulty with the defendant's contention, however, is found in the modification of the rule laid down…

Walters v. City of New York

That case was affirmed on the opinion below. ( 167 N.Y. 567. See, too, Martin v. City of New York, 82 App.…