From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ohanian v. Apple, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
20 Civ. 5162 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)

Opinion

20 Civ. 5162 (LGS)

05-02-2022

TIGRAN OHANIAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

Lorina G. Schofield United States District Judge

WHEREAS, on July 6, 2020, Plaintiffs Tigran Ohanian (“Ohanian”) and Regge Lopez (“Lopez”) filed a Complaint asserting claims against Defendants Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) and T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) (Dkt. No. 1);

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, Lopez voluntarily dismissed all of his claims against T-Mobile without prejudice (Dkt. No. 44);

WHEREAS, on April 30, 2021, Apple filed a motion to dismiss Lopez's claims against it (Dkt. No. 68);

WHEREAS, on November 16, 2021, Apple's motion to dismiss Lopez's claims against it was granted in part and denied in part. Lopez's claims against Apple for fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment were dismissed, and his claims against Apple under the New York General Business Law (“GBL”) were dismissed for transactions that took place outside New York, but his claims under the GBL survived dismissal for transactions that took place in New York (Dkt. No. 107);

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2021, T-Mobile and Apple each filed motions to dismiss Ohanian's claims against them (Dkt. Nos. 110 and 112);

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a letter motion seeking leave to amend the Complaint in order to amplify Lopez's remaining claims under the GBL against Apple and Ohanian's claims against T-Mobile, and notifying the Court that Ohanian intended to voluntarily dismiss his claims against Apple (Dkt. No. 121);

WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022, the Court granted leave to amend the Complaint only to the extent of Lopez conforming his allegations to the Opinion and Order on Apple's motion to dismiss and of Ohanian amending his allegations to address contentions in T-Mobile's then-pending motion to dismiss, and denied the pending motions to dismiss as moot (Dkt. No. 122);

WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, Ohanian voluntarily dismissed all of his individual claims against Apple without prejudice (Dkt. No. 123);

WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 124);

WHEREAS, on January 31, 2022, T-Mobile filed a renewed motion to dismiss Ohanian's claims against it (Dkt. No. 130);

WHEREAS, on March 18, 2022, Ohanian's claims against T-Mobile were dismissed, and Ohanian was given until April 1, 2022, to seek leave to amend the Complaint but did not do so (Dkt. No. 145);

WHEREAS, on April 28, 2022, Lopez and Apple filed a stipulation of voluntary dismissal of his remaining individual claims against Apple with prejudice (Dkt. No. 150). It is hereby

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter Judgment in favor of Defendants.


Summaries of

Ohanian v. Apple, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
20 Civ. 5162 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Ohanian v. Apple, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TIGRAN OHANIAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 2, 2022

Citations

20 Civ. 5162 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)