From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Haire v. Napa State Hospital

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
No. C 07-0002 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 07-0002 RMW (PR).

February 8, 2010


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME; DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY (Docket Nos. 115, 116)


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for enlargement of time in which to oppose defendants' motion for summary judgment. Good cause being shown, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's opposition shall be filed within thirty days of the filing date of this order. Defendants shall file their reply fifteen days thereafter.

On January 4, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to compel response to pending discovery. On January 5, 2010, the court denied plaintiff's previous motions to compel discovery. In the present motion, plaintiff raised nothing new that was not previously considered in the court's January 5 order. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the court's January 5, 2010 order, plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED.

This order terminates docket numbers 115 and 116.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

O'Haire v. Napa State Hospital

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
No. C 07-0002 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)
Case details for

O'Haire v. Napa State Hospital

Case Details

Full title:PAUL D. O'HAIRE, Plaintiff, v. NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2010

Citations

No. C 07-0002 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)