From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ohaegbu v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Feb 7, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cv-1329-Orl-19DAB, (6:92-cr-035-Orl-19DAB) (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 6:05-cv-1329-Orl-19DAB, (6:92-cr-035-Orl-19DAB).

February 7, 2006


ORDER


This case is before the Court on the following motions:

1. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Doc. No. 5, filed February 2, 2006) is DENIED. Any appeal by Petitioner would not be taken in good faith under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a) because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the deprivation of any federal constitutional right. Thus, Petitioner is not entitled to appeal as a pauper and shall pay the $255.00 appellate filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

2. Petitioner's Notice of Appeal is construed as a Request for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. No. 6, filed February 2, 2006). This Court should grant an application for certificate of appealability only if the Petitioner makes "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right; therefore, the request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ohaegbu v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Feb 7, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cv-1329-Orl-19DAB, (6:92-cr-035-Orl-19DAB) (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Ohaegbu v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL OHAEGBU, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Feb 7, 2006

Citations

Case No. 6:05-cv-1329-Orl-19DAB, (6:92-cr-035-Orl-19DAB) (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2006)