From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Gorman v. O'Gorman

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 8, 1971
181 S.E.2d 490 (Ga. 1971)

Opinion

26389.

ARGUED MARCH 9, 1971.

DECIDED APRIL 8, 1971.

Divorce. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Morgan.

Richardson, Chenggis Constantinides, Robert P. Mallis, for appellant.

Houston White, Sr., for appellee.


This appeal involves ruling made in a divorce and alimony case. All the enumerations of error require consideration of the evidence. However, appellant specified in his notice of appeal that no transcript be filed in the record of appeal, and none has been sent to this court. Furthermore, no stipulation showing the facts necessary for rulings by this court has been entered into and filed. The duty rests upon the appellant to have the transcript prepared if needed for decision here. Code Ann. § 6-805 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24). Without the transcript we must assume that the evidence authorized the judgments. Under these circumstances the judgments complained of must be affirmed. See Graham v. Haley, 224 Ga. 498 ( 162 S.E.2d 346).

Judgments affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED MARCH 9, 1971 — DECIDED APRIL 8, 1971.


Summaries of

O'Gorman v. O'Gorman

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 8, 1971
181 S.E.2d 490 (Ga. 1971)
Case details for

O'Gorman v. O'Gorman

Case Details

Full title:O'GORMAN v. O'GORMAN

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Apr 8, 1971

Citations

181 S.E.2d 490 (Ga. 1971)
227 Ga. 468

Citing Cases

Tolbert v. Tolbert

" Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 795 (2) ( 158 S.E.2d 679). Accord: Delta Corp v. Aiken, 224 Ga. 241 ( 161 S.E.2d…

Taylor v. Taylor

In the absence of a proper transcript or stipulation, we must assume that the trial judge made his award of…