Opinion
2021-UP-268
07-12-2021
Lorna and Felicia Oglesby, Respondents, v. Lakeisha Woodley, Durian Pressley, and John Doe, Defendants, Of whom Lakeisha Woodley is the Appellant. In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen. Appellate Case No. 2020-001651
Jennifer Lynn Mook, of Law Office of Jennifer Mook, LLC, of Aiken, for Appellant. Mary Elizabeth Parrilla, of The Parrilla Law Firm, LLC, of Anderson, for Respondents. Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Submitted June 28, 2021
Appeal From Greenville County Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Jennifer Lynn Mook, of Law Office of Jennifer Mook, LLC, of Aiken, for Appellant.
Mary Elizabeth Parrilla, of The Parrilla Law Firm, LLC, of Anderson, for Respondents.
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM
Lakeisha Woodley appeals the family court's final order finding her relinquishment of parental rights was proper and complied with statutory requirements and alternately terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-9-330 (2010) (setting forth the requirements of a relinquishment form); § 63-9-340 (2010) (setting forth the procedure for executing a relinquishment form); § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020) (setting forth the statutory grounds for termination of parental rights). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Woodley's counsel.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
LOCKEMY, C. J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.