From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oglesby v. Bowersox

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Feb 17, 2006
Case No. 4:06CV126 AGF (E.D. Mo. Feb. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 4:06CV126 AGF.

February 17, 2006


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel. Petitioner, a Missouri prisoner, filed this action pro se for federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. "`[T]here is neither a constitutional nor statutory right to counsel in habeas proceedings; instead, it is committed to the discretion of the trial court.'" Morris v. Dormire, 217 F.3d 556, 558 (8th Cir. 2000) (quoting McCall v. Benson, 114 F.3d 754, 756 (8th Cir. 1997)). In deciding whether to appoint counsel, the district court properly considers "the factual and legal complexity of the case, and the petitioner's ability both to investigate and to articulate his claims without court appointed counsel." Id. Upon review of the file, the Court concludes that the appointment of counsel is not necessary in this case.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. [Doc. #3]


Summaries of

Oglesby v. Bowersox

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Feb 17, 2006
Case No. 4:06CV126 AGF (E.D. Mo. Feb. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Oglesby v. Bowersox

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL OGLESBY, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 17, 2006

Citations

Case No. 4:06CV126 AGF (E.D. Mo. Feb. 17, 2006)