From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ogle v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 28, 2012
3:12-CV-00571-BR (D. Or. Jun. 28, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-CV-00571-BR

06-28-2012

DAVID J. OGLE, Plaintiff, v. RALPH A. YATES, D.O.; LISA A. CORNELIUS, D.P.M.; KATHLEEN HALEY, Esq.; DOUGLAS B. KIRKPATRICK, M.D.; DONALD E. GIRARD, M.D.; GEORGE N. KOVAL, M.D.; ROGER M. McKIMMY, M.D.; LEWIS D. NEACE, D.O.; KEITH A. WHITE, M.D.; W. KENT WILLIAMSON, M.D.; SHERIDAN A. THIRINGER, D.O.; JOSEPH J. THALER, M.D.; ERIC BROWN; MEI-MEI WANG; TERRY LEWIS; OREGON MEDICAL BOARD; WARREN G. FOOTE, Esq.; CAROLYN ALEXANDER; DAVID SCHUMAN; ROBERT WOLLHEIM; LYNN R. NAKAMOTO; STATE OF OREGON; 50 JOHN DOES; 50 JANE DOES, Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#4) on April 6, 2012, in which she recommends the Court sua sponte (1) dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Oregon Medical Board, Warren G. Foote, Carolyn Alexander, David Schuman, Robert Wollheim, Lynn R. Nakamoto, and the State of Oregon; (2) dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Ralph A. Yates, Lisa A. Cornelius, Kathleen Haley, Douglas B. Kirkpatrick, Donald E. Girard, George N. Koval, Roger M. McKimmy, Lewis D. Neace, Keith A. White, W. Kent Williamson, Sheridan A. Thiringer, Joseph J. Thaler, Eric Brown, Mei-Mei Wang, and Terry Lewis; and (3) grant Plaintiff leave to filed an Amended Complaint to cure the deficiencies noted in the Findings and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed timely Objections and Supplemental Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and Supplemental Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#4) and, therefore,

1. DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Oregon Medical Board, Warren G. Foote, Carolyn Alexander, David Schuman, Robert Wollheim, Lynn R. Nakamoto, and the State of Oregon;
2. DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Ralph A. Yates, Lisa A. Cornelius, Kathleen Haley, Douglas B. Kirkpatrick, Donald E. Girard, George N. Koval, Roger M. McKimmy, Lewis D. Neace, Keith A. White, W. Kent Williamson, Sheridan A. Thiringer, Joseph J. Thaler, Eric Brown, Mei-Mei Wang, and Terry Lewis; and
3. GRANTS Plaintiff leave to filed an Amended Complaint only as to Defendants Ralph A. Yates, Lisa A. Cornelius, Kathleen Haley, Douglas B. Kirkpatrick, Donald E. Girard, George N. Koval, Roger M. McKimmy,
Lewis D. Neace, Keith A. White, W. Kent Williamson, Sheridan A. Thiringer, Joseph J. Thaler, Eric Brown, Mei-Mei Wang, and Terry Lewis to cure the deficiencies set out in the Findings and Recommendation no later than July 19, 2012. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in the Findings and Recommendation shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ogle v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 28, 2012
3:12-CV-00571-BR (D. Or. Jun. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Ogle v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:DAVID J. OGLE, Plaintiff, v. RALPH A. YATES, D.O.; LISA A. CORNELIUS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

Citations

3:12-CV-00571-BR (D. Or. Jun. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

Bondick v. Sanchez

Thus, Plaintiff “cannot sue the State of Oregon or any of its agencies, including the Oregon Medical Board,…