From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ogle v. Railroad Retirement Board

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 5, 1956
238 F.2d 233 (6th Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 12772.

October 5, 1956.

Karl D. Saulpaw, Jr., and William C. Wilson, of Ambrose Wilson, Knoxville, Tenn., for petitioner.

Myles F. Gibbons, Gen. Counsel, Railroad Retirement Bd., Chicago, Ill., David B. Schreiber, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., Paul M. Johnson and Charles F. McLaughlin, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


Petitioner, Carl B. Ogle, 53 years of age and with less than twenty years of service, filed an application for an annuity under Section 2(a)(5) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 as amended, 45 U.S.C.A. § 228b(a)(5), which provides for an annuity to such applicants "whose permanent physical or mental condition is such that they are unable to engage in any regular employment." His claim was based upon permanent disability due to the amputation of his leg, which was service connected, the condition of his heart, and prostate gland.

Following adverse rulings on the claim by the Bureau of Retirement Claims and the Appeals Council, the Railroad Retirement Board found that petitioner's permanent physical and mental condition "was not shown to be such that he is unable to engage in any regular employment within the meaning of Section 2(a)(5) of the Act" and denied the claim. This review followed. 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 228k, 355(f).

The Court is of the opinion that the findings of the Board are supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud are conclusive. Lane v. Railroad Retirement Board, 6 Cir., 185 F.2d 819; United States v. Mayfield, 10 Cir., 64 F.2d 214; Berry v. United States, 2 Cir., 111 F.2d 615, 617.

The Order of the Board is affirmed.


Summaries of

Ogle v. Railroad Retirement Board

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 5, 1956
238 F.2d 233 (6th Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Ogle v. Railroad Retirement Board

Case Details

Full title:Carl B. OGLE, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 1956

Citations

238 F.2d 233 (6th Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

Duncan v. Railroad Retirement Board

[s]uch a determination requires resolution of two issues — what can applicant do, and what employment…

Coker v. Gielow

The law is well settled that a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding entitlement to benefits…