Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Steinthal

Full title: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. SUSAN STEINTHAL, Respondent

Court: SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 27, 2019

No. 2607 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jun. 27, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2607 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 156 DB 2018

06-27-2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. SUSAN STEINTHAL, Respondent

PER CURIAM

New York Bar Registration No. 2747517 (Out of State) ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27^th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted. Susan Steinthal is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of six months. Consistent with the Joint Petition, Respondent shall not apply for admission to the Bar of this Commonwealth for two years from the date of this Order. She shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217, and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Justice Mundy dissents and would deny the joint petition for discipline on consent in favor of a six-month suspension, with no additional conditions.

Justice Todd and Justice Wecht join this dissent.