From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Potter

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 13, 2020
No. 2748 Disciplinary Docket No 3 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2748 Disciplinary Docket No 3

10-13-2020

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. SEAN ANDREW POTTER, Respondent


Board File Nos. C3-19-801; C3-19-902; C3-19-942; C3-20-7; C3-20-221; C3-20-229; C3-20-379; and C3-20-485 Attorney Registration No. 92102 (Perry County) ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, in the absence of a response to this Court's Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute, and it is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; and

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Perry County shall enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent's clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g).

Respondent's rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6), are specifically preserved.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Potter

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 13, 2020
No. 2748 Disciplinary Docket No 3 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. SEAN ANDREW POTTER…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

No. 2748 Disciplinary Docket No 3 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2020)