From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Litman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 12, 2012
No. 1834 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jul. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1834 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

07-12-2012

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. DONALD SAUNDERS LITMAN, Respondent


No. 168 DB 2009


Attorney Registration No. 54767


(Montgomery County)


ORDER

PER CURIAM :

AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated March 6, 2012, it is hereby

ORDERED that Donald Saunders Litman be subjected to public censure by the Supreme Court.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Litman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 12, 2012
No. 1834 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jul. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Litman

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. DONALD SAUNDERS LITMAN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

Citations

No. 1834 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jul. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hindman

A public censure was imposed on an attorney who "repeatedly crossed the line of permissible advocacy by…