From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 8, 2010
No. 28686 (Haw. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. 28686

December 8, 2010.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 08-053-8696)

By: RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA and DUFFY, JJ., and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge NAKAMURA, assigned by reason of vacancy.


ORDER OF DISBARMENT

Upon consideration of the Disciplinary Board's Report and Recommendation for the Disbarment of Respondent Steven B. Johnson and Respondent Johnson's lack of objection thereto as exhibited by his failure to request briefing as permitted by Rule 2.7(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), it appears that Respondent Johnson failed to disclose Oregon disciplinary matters in his 2004 bar application and failed to update the application before he was admitted to the Bar of the State of Hawai'i in violation of rules governing admission to the Bar and Rules 3.3(a) (A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal); 8.1(a) (An applicant for admission to the bar, or a lawyer in connection with a bar admission application or in connection with a disciplinary matter, shall not: (a) knowingly make a false statement of material fact); 8.1(b) (An applicant for admission to the bar, or a lawyer in connection with a bar admission application or in connection with a disciplinary matter, shall not: . . . (b) fail to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen in the matter); 8.4(a) (It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (a) violate or attempt to violate the rules of professional conduct); and 8.4(c) (It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: . . . (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Steven B. Johnson is disbarred from the practice of law in this jurisdiction, effective immediately, notwithstanding RSCH Rule 2.16(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.2(d), that in addition to the requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16, Respondent must apply for, take, and pass the Hawai'i Bar Examination before a reinstatement petition will be considered.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 8, 2010
No. 28686 (Haw. Dec. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. STEVEN B. JOHNSON…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

Citations

No. 28686 (Haw. Dec. 8, 2010)