From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 8, 2019
No. 2658 Disciplinary Docket No 3 (Pa. Nov. 8, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2658 Disciplinary Docket No 3

11-08-2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. DAVID W. HARRIS, III, Respondent


File Nos. C3-18-867; C3-18-892; C3-19-156; C3-19-239; C3-19-360; C3-19-587; C3-19-648 Attorney Registration No. 75708 (Lackawanna County) ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of November, 2019, in the absence of a response to this Court's Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute. It is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County shall enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent's clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); and

4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze such accounts pending further action.

Respondent's rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6), are specifically preserved.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 8, 2019
No. 2658 Disciplinary Docket No 3 (Pa. Nov. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. DAVID W. HARRIS, III…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 8, 2019

Citations

No. 2658 Disciplinary Docket No 3 (Pa. Nov. 8, 2019)