From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Countiss

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Aug 10, 2006
26773 (Haw. Aug. 10, 2006)

Opinion

26773

August 10, 2006.

ODC 02-203-7401.

James T. Countiss, pro se respondent.

Geoffrey M. Kam, assistant disciplinary, counsel, for petitioner.


ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT


Upon consideration of (1) Respondent James T. Countiss's June 5, 2006 Declaration in Support of his request for reinstatement, (2) Petitioner's July 3, 2006, position statement, Respondent's July 17, 2006 declaration, and (3) the record, it appears that Respondent James T. Countiss has complied with this court's suspension order and has paid all required fees. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2.17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai`i (RSCH), that Respondent James T. Countiss (attorney 1440) is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Hawai`i and may resume the practice of law upon payment of all required registration fees. See RSCH 17.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Countiss

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Aug 10, 2006
26773 (Haw. Aug. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Countiss

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. JAMES T. COUNTISS…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Aug 10, 2006

Citations

26773 (Haw. Aug. 10, 2006)