From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cahill

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 16, 2012
No. 1745 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1745 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 96 DB 2011

11-16-2012

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOHN MARTIN CAHILL, JR., Respondent


Attorney Registration No. 87233

(Philadelphia)


ORDER

PER CURIAM :

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2012, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated August 30, 2012, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that John Martin Cahill, Jr., is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that, at the conclusion of the suspension period, respondent shall pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

Mr. Justice McCaffery dissents.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cahill

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 16, 2012
No. 1745 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cahill

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOHN MARTIN CAHILL, JR.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

No. 1745 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Nov. 16, 2012)