From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banke

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 16, 2012
No. 1853 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1853 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 58 DB 2012 Attorney Registration No. 59933

08-16-2012

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOHN RICHARD BANKE, II, Respondent


(Westmoreland County)


ORDER

PER CURIAM :

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated June 13, 2012, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that John Richard Banke, II, is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banke

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 16, 2012
No. 1853 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Aug. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banke

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOHN RICHARD BANKE, II…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

No. 1853 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Aug. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Orloff

Although there is no per se rule for discipline in conversion cases, a suspension of not less than one year…