Summary
In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Charles Aliano, 25 DB 2003 (D.Bd. Rpt. 8/31/05) (S. Ct. Order 12/1/05), the respondent-attorney, who held the part-time position of District Attorney of Susquehanna County, received a public censure for engaging in a conflict of interest and violating RPC 1.7(a), RPC 1.7(b) and RPC 8.4(d).
Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NicholsOpinion
No. 1067 DISC. 3.
December 1, 2005.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated August 31, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, the request for oral argument is denied pursuant to Rule 208(e)(4), Pa.R.D.E., and it is hereby
ORDERED that CHARLES J. ALIANO be subjected to PUBLIC CENSURE by the Supreme Court.
It is further ORDERED that the expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this matter shall be paid by the Respondent.
Mr. Justice Saylor dissents in favor of a private reprimand.