From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Acquista

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 21, 2013
No. 1983 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Oct. 21, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1983 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 100 DB 2013 Attorney Registration No. 73763

2013-10-21

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. LEE SAMUEL ACQUISTA, Respondent


(Erie County)


ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2013, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated September 4, 2013, it is hereby

ORDERED that Lee Samuel Acquista is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f)(5), Pa.R.D.E., until further definitive action by this Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Acquista

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 21, 2013
No. 1983 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Oct. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Acquista

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. LEE SAMUEL ACQUISTA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 21, 2013

Citations

No. 1983 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Oct. 21, 2013)