From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disc. Counsel v. Houlihan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 2006
896 A.2d 1164 (Pa. 2006)

Summary

In Houlihan, a four year period of suspension was imposed for an attorney who, in addition to other misconduct, submitted an Acceptance of Service to the Court that he knew to be forged.

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shelton

Opinion

No. 1117 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

March 28, 2006.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 4, 2006, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that Daniel E. Houlihan be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of four years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.


Summaries of

Office of Disc. Counsel v. Houlihan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 2006
896 A.2d 1164 (Pa. 2006)

In Houlihan, a four year period of suspension was imposed for an attorney who, in addition to other misconduct, submitted an Acceptance of Service to the Court that he knew to be forged.

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shelton
Case details for

Office of Disc. Counsel v. Houlihan

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Daniel E. HOULIHAN…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 28, 2006

Citations

896 A.2d 1164 (Pa. 2006)
896 A.2d 1164

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shelton

Depending on the particular facts, a wide range of public discipline from public censure to disbarment has…

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Respondent

193. Based on precedent, the amount of discipline that should be imposed for Respondent's multifarious…