From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Dis. Counsel v. Russell

Supreme Court of Hawaii
May 23, 2011
No. SCAD-11-0000358 (Haw. May. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. SCAD-11-0000358

May 23, 2011.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 09-108-8831, 09-109-8832, 09-110-8833, 09-111-8834)

By: RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, DUFFY, and MCKENNA, JJ.


ORDER OF DISBARMENT

Upon consideration of the Disciplinary Board's report and recommendation to disbar Respondent Vickery J. Russell, Russell's lack of objection thereto, and the record, it appears that in the representation of three clients and the investigation of the complaints, Russell violated Hawai'i Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.3, Rule 1.4(a), Rule 1.15(a)(1), Rule 1.15(c), Rule 1.15(d), Rule 1.15(f)(3), Rule 1.16(d), Rule 3.4(e), Rule 8.4(a), Rule 8.4(c), and Rule 8.4(d), as well as Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH) Rule 17(d) (1). It further appears that the Respondent Vickery J. Russell cannot be found within the State and that she no longer maintains a practice in Hawai'i and, therefore, the disbarment effective thirty (30) days after the entry of this order, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.16(c), would serve no purpose. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Russell is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Hawai'i effective, notwithstanding Rule 2.16(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i, immediately upon entry of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of reinstatement, in addition to the requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16, Russell shall pay restitution as follows:

To Alan Cabos, the amount of $2,000.00;

To Charlene P. Kuhia, the amount of $7,500.00; and

To James Wayne Shamblin, the amount of $4,500.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to any other requirements for reinstatement imposed by the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i, Respondent Russell shall pay all costs of these proceedings as approved upon timely submission of a bill of costs and an opportunity to respond thereto, as prescribed by RSCH Rule 2.


Summaries of

Office of Dis. Counsel v. Russell

Supreme Court of Hawaii
May 23, 2011
No. SCAD-11-0000358 (Haw. May. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Office of Dis. Counsel v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. VICKERY J. RUSSELL…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

No. SCAD-11-0000358 (Haw. May. 23, 2011)