From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Admin. v. State Emps.' Ret. Bd.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 3, 2016
163 A.3d 395 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 76 MAL 2016

08-03-2016

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION and Pennsylvania State Police, Petitioners v. STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent Bruce A. Edwards, Joseph R. Kovel, Joseph E. Sarkis, PA State Troopers Association, Intervenors


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows:

Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State Employees' Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to work exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees' Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?


Summaries of

Office of Admin. v. State Emps.' Ret. Bd.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 3, 2016
163 A.3d 395 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Office of Admin. v. State Emps.' Ret. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION AND PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Petitioners v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 3, 2016

Citations

163 A.3d 395 (Pa. 2016)