From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI MDL No. 1827

10-04-2011

In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to Individual Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI OFFICE DEPOT, INC., Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

Paul P. Eyre Ernest E. Vargo Michael E. Mumford BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Tracy Cole BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. Philip J. Iovieno BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Counsel for Plaintiff Office Depot, Inc.


Paul P. Eyre

Ernest E. Vargo

Michael E. Mumford

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

Tracy Cole

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD. TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Clerk's Action Required

WHEREAS, plaintiff Office Depot, Inc. ("Office Depot") filed a First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned action against defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. ("Mitsui Taiwan"), among other defendants, on September 19, 2011.

Whereas, Office Depot and Mitsui Taiwan previously entered into a stipulation giving Mitsui Taiwan until October 19, 2011 to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. (See Dkt. #35; MDL Dkt. #3455.)

WHEREAS, Office Depot and Mitsui Taiwan have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil Rule L.R. 6-1(a), pursuant to which Mitsui Taiwan shall have an extension until December 1, 2011 in which to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Office Depot, on the one hand, and Mitsui Taiwan, on the other hand, that Mitsui Taiwan's deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint will be December 1, 2011.

Paul P. Eyre

Ernest E. Vargo

Michael E. Mumford

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

Counsel for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.

Philip J. Iovieno

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

Counsel for Plaintiff Office Depot, Inc.

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has been obtained.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON


Summaries of

Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)