From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oestriecher v. Wallace

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Nov 27, 2007
NO. 07-1044, SECTION: "B"(3) (E.D. La. Nov. 27, 2007)

Opinion

NO. 07-1044, SECTION: "B"(3).

November 27, 2007


ORDER


The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default, Rec. Doc. 29, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment, Rec. Doc. 35, is GRANTED and that plaintiff's excessive force claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, but with prejudice for the purpose of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claim for verbal abuse is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous and for otherwise failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted.


Summaries of

Oestriecher v. Wallace

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Nov 27, 2007
NO. 07-1044, SECTION: "B"(3) (E.D. La. Nov. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Oestriecher v. Wallace

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND R. OESTRIECHER v. CHARLES WALLACE, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Nov 27, 2007

Citations

NO. 07-1044, SECTION: "B"(3) (E.D. La. Nov. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Kent

Further, because Parker has no constitutional right to have his grievances properly investigated, handled, or…

Khalil v. Bickham

Additionally, backlogging of ARPs is decidedly constitutional, so the fact that the ARP was backlogged is of…