Opinion
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-242-SPM-AK.
June 4, 2008
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Doc. 32, Motion for Summary Judgment, and Doc. 33, the Statement of Facts, by Wal-Mart. Though a significant amount of time has passed since the motion was filed without any response from Plaintiff, it appears Plaintiff was never advised of his obligations in this regard and the consequences of failing to file a response. Consequently, this Order will provide the requisite notice.
"[S]ummary judgment may not be entered against a party unless the court has strictly complied with the notice requirements mandated by Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)." Brown v. Shinbaum, 828 F.2d 707, 708 (11th Cir. 1987) (citing Griffith v. Wainwright, 772 F.2d 822, 824-25 (11th Cir. 1985)). This requires that the Court give express 10-day notice of the summary judgment rules, of the right to file affidavits or other material, and the consequences of default, i.e., that final judgment may be entered without a trial and that the moving party's evidence may be accepted as true if not contradicted by sworn affidavits. Id. This order is entered in compliance with Brown and Griffith.
The Court must therefore advise Plaintiff that in opposing Defendant's motion, he is the nonmoving party, and as Plaintiff, he bears the burden of proof. In this situation, Defendant need not negate Plaintiff's claims. Rather, the burden on a defendant moving for summary judgment is to demonstrate an absence of evidence to support the plaintiff's case. Celotex Corporation v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). In opposition, Plaintiff must come forward with evidentiary material demonstrating a genuine issue of fact for trial. Reliance on the pleadings is inadequate. Id. at 324. Evidentiary material which would be acceptable in opposition to the motion includes sworn affidavits, sworn documents, or other evidence indicating the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). Sworn affidavits offered in opposition to the motion must be based on personal knowledge, set forth such facts as would be admissible into evidence, and affirmatively show that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). It is unnecessary for Plaintiff to refile any materials which would be duplicative of documents which are presently before the Court for its consideration, unless necessary to bring those documents into compliance with Rule 56(e).
The Court will take the motion for summary judgment under advisement no later than July 8, 2008, and Plaintiff must file all argument and evidence in opposition to summary judgment before that date.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
That the motion for summary judgment and the statement of facts will be taken under advisement no later than July 8, 2008, and a report and recommendation will be entered after that date;
That the parties must submit any additional material in support of or in opposition to summary judgment before that date.
DONE AND ORDERED