From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oem-Tech, Co. v. Video Gaming Techs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. 3:10-cv-04368-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cv-04368-RS

10-24-2011

OEM-TECH, CO., a California sole proprietorship owned and operated by Charles Estes, Plaintiff, v. VIDEO GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Corporation doing business in California as VGT, INC., and DOES 1-50, inclusive Defendant.

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP ANDREW W. STROUD (SBN 126475) LANDON D. BAILEY (SBN 240236) Attorneys for Defendant Video Gaming Technologies, Inc. CHARLES R. ESTES 650 Murray Hill Rd. Hill, N.H. 03243 In pro per


MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

ANDREW W. STROUD (SBN 126475)

LANDON D. BAILEY (SBN 240236)

Attorneys for Defendant

Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.

CHARLES R. ESTES

650 Murray Hill Rd.

Hill, N.H. 03243

In pro per

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

Judge: Honorable Richard Seeborg

Location: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor

Complaint Filed: July 16, 2010

Date of Removal: September 28, 2010

RECITALS

1. On June 30, 2011, this Court issued a Case Management Scheduling Order in the above-captioned matter.

2. The June 30, 2011 Case Managements Scheduling Order (a) set November 30, 2011 as the deadline to complete all non-expert discovery; (b) set this matter for a further Case Management Conference on December 15, 2011; and (c) referred this matter to Early Neutral Evaluation, to be completed within ninety (90) days of the Order.

3. The parties participated in an Early Neutral Evaluation session on September 23, 2011. At the conclusion of the Early Neutral Evaluation session, the parties entered into a stipulation whereby they agreed to continue certain discovery deadlines to enable the parties to attempt to reach an informal resolution to the matter. In this stipulation, the parties also agreed that, should the parties' negotiations not be successful after three weeks, the parties would mutually seek from this Court and stipulate to an extension of court-established dates.

4. Unfortunately, the parties have not been able to reach an agreement with regard to an informal resolution of this matter to date. Accordingly, pursuant to their stipulation following the Early Neutral Evaluation, the parties now mutually agree and stipulate to a four (4) week continuance of the non-expert discovery deadline and the Case Management Conference established by this Court in its June 30, 2011 Scheduling Order.

STIPULATION

In light of the above-recited facts, the parties hereby stipulate to modify the June 30, 2011 Case Management Scheduling Order as follows:

1. The deadline for completion of non-expert discovery in this matter, as established in Paragraph 2 of the June 30, 2011 Scheduling Order, shall be continued four (4) weeks such that the applicable deadline shall now be December 28, 2011.

2. The Further Case Management Conference in this matter shall be continued four (4) weeks such that it will now be held on January 12, 2012.

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

ANDREW W. STROUD

LANDON D. BAILEY

Landon D. Bailey

Attorneys for Defendant

Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.

OEM-TECH, CO.

Charles Estes

In Pro Per

Sole Proprietor of OEM-TECH, CO.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Honorable Richard Seeborg

United States District Court, Northern District of California


Summaries of

Oem-Tech, Co. v. Video Gaming Techs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. 3:10-cv-04368-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Oem-Tech, Co. v. Video Gaming Techs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OEM-TECH, CO., a California sole proprietorship owned and operated by…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cv-04368-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)