Opinion
Civil Action No. 19-11754 (CCC)
01-12-2021
Re: UZOUKWU ODUTOLA v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
CHAMBERS OF JAMES B. CLARK, III UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Dear Counsel:
Presently pending before the Court is a motion by Defendants the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Deirdre Webster Cobb, Esq., the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal (collectively the "New Jersey Defendants") to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Defendant City of Newark's crossclaim. See Dkt. No. 27. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant City of Newark filed an opposition to the motion. Both Plaintiff and Defendant City of Newark have notified the Court that they consent to the granting of the New Jersey Defendants' motion to dismiss. See Dkt. Nos. 35, 40.
Based on the consent of both Plaintiff and the City of Newark, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the New Jersey Defendants' motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 27] be GRANTED. Pursuant to L. Civ. R. 72.1 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, objections to this Report and Recommendation shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after service hereof. Any party may respond to another party's objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ James B. Clark, III
JAMES B. CLARK, III
United States Magistrate Judge