From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Donnell v. Marine Transit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

January, 1931.


Order granting plaintiffs' motion to strike out the sixth separate defense in answer of defendant Globe and Rutgers Fire Insurance Company affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Assuming that the Admiralty Court could have determined plaintiffs' claim of appellant's liability under the policy in question, if an issue thereon were properly tendered, and made a binding decree, we are unable to find any allegation that any such issue was tendered in the admiralty proceedings or that any such determination was made. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Donnell v. Marine Transit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

O'Donnell v. Marine Transit Corporation

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS O'DONNELL and Others, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)