From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odom v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 18, 2012
Case No. 2D11-2075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2D11-2075

05-18-2012

DUSTIN D. ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Danilo Cruz-Carino, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Denise Pomponio,

Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender,

and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Danilo Cruz-Carino,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellee.
DAVIS, Judge.

Dustin D. Odom challenges the thirty-six-month prison term imposed following a revocation of his community control for the original offense of possession of a controlled substance. The only issue raised by Odom's counsel and answered by the State is related to the possession issue discussed in State v. Adkins, 71 So. 3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 71 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 2011). But Odom's revocation was based on a technical violation and does not involve any possession-related new law violations. Because the Adkins issue relates only to his underlying conviction and not to the revocation and sentence currently before this court, we affirm Odom's revocation and resulting sentence without further comment.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Odom v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 18, 2012
Case No. 2D11-2075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Odom v. State

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN D. ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2D11-2075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 18, 2012)