From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 25, 1925
269 S.W. 92 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. 9265.

Delivered February 25, 1925.

Driving An Auto — Intoxicated — Affirmed.

The indictment appears regular. The record is without statement of facts or bills of exception. No fundamental error has been discovered, or pointed out, and the judgment is affirmed.

Appeal from the District Court of Lavaca County. Tried below before the Hon. M. C. Jeffrey, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for driving an automobile upon the street while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; penalty, one year in the penitentiary.

No brief filed for appellant.

Tom Garrard, State's Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.


The conviction is for driving an automobile upon the street while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. No fundamental error has been discovered or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Odom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 25, 1925
269 S.W. 92 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Odom v. State

Case Details

Full title:C. B. ODOM v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 25, 1925

Citations

269 S.W. 92 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
99 Tex. Crim. 359

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The indictment in this case, is not obnoxious to the rule against duplicity, but comes within the rule…

Smith and Wright v. State

The exact point raised by appellant does not seem to have been expressly passed on in Texas, but many cases…