From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odom v. Beltrain

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 7, 2022
6:22-cv-00191 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

6:22-cv-00191

11-07-2022

James Ralph Odom, Plaintiff, v. Officer Beltrain et al. Defendants.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER, United States District Judge

Plaintiff James Ralph Odom, formerly confined within the Gregg County Jail proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love.

On September 12, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff 's lawsuit be dismissed, without prejudice, for plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court and the failure to prosecute. Doc. 10. A copy of this report was sent to plaintiff at his last-known address. To date, however, plaintiff has not filed objections.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation.

Plaintiff's lawsuit is dismissed, without prejudice, for plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court and to prosecute his case. All motions pending in this civil action are denied.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Odom v. Beltrain

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 7, 2022
6:22-cv-00191 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Odom v. Beltrain

Case Details

Full title:James Ralph Odom, Plaintiff, v. Officer Beltrain et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

6:22-cv-00191 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2022)